User talk:PsiWarp

From NS2 community wiki

Thanks for catching my errors. Guess I'm too tired to be wiki-ing. Quovatis 05:46, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

No worries, you've done a great job against the onslaught of spam :D!! PsiWarp 06:27, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

A lot of the recent stuff you added isn't even live yet, and may never actually go into the game. It's not a big deal as I think the stuff will indeed go in the next patch, but the info on the wiki should be current info. Some players might come to the wiki, look up fade, and then wonder why they can't do the double tap blink in game (yet). Quovatis 22:16, 28 May 2011 (UTC)

Community Portal spelling error?

I can't decide if this statement on the front of the Community Portal is a pun or failed wikicode. Maybe you can tell me.

Currently [[editing]] 678 articles related to Natural Selection 2 in multiple languages!

Also, we really should think about moving that page; its location is a mess._Techercizer ^(.Feed.) _(.Nerf.) 18:55, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, I have no clue, this account was my first wiki experience after all :D. I agree with moving it to a better location though.--PsiWarp 19:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Is there any red tape I need to go to first, or can I just ctrl+a,c,v the entire thing and turn it into a redirect?_Techercizer ^(.Feed.) _(.Nerf.) 00:29, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Don't think so, but try asking Quovatis since he's been here longer.--PsiWarp 00:32, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Frontiersmen weapons and structures

Could you please fix (restore) the structure of the weapons and structures to what it was? Right now is incredible unreadable and it was perfectly fine before you changed it. Using text to make an arrow? ---> wtf? Please, before you do anything like this discuss it with the others.

Thanks PaiSand 23:30, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

I understand your concern. Although at the time only a few people were active, I attempted the change in hopes of further organizing the page. What do you find unreadable about new layout, by the way? They are listed with centered titles, with images above the link to their respective articles, and ordered in such a way that is similar to in-game (for example, armory weapons, structures in the build and advanced tabs in Commander Menu). In the future, I will take care to wait for proper feedback before attempting large changes as such.--PsiWarp 01:00, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Titles, images and names are too close. There is a reason to not do that, and is readability. Just check how I see it:

When you make a design you must always take into consideration not only your small screen but all of them.

It was a lot better the old readable table. Please, put that table back again.

Thanks

PaiSand 21:39, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

I see, it may have something to do with the bolded text, but I'll revert it for comparison (hopefully better visibility/readability for all). I am curious though, what resolution do you have for your computer/monitor (I usually run it on 1680x1050)?--PsiWarp 22:47, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

And there we are! The table format has been reverted, hopefully it will be readable again :)--PsiWarp 22:52, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

Sysop

Promoted you to Sysop for the great work you have done lately. You can also help deal with the spam we occasionally get. Quovatis 16:37, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you very much! I will try my best to get the handle of things :)--PsiWarp 21:27, 22 May 2012 (UTC)