midspace
Jun 29 2005, 11:51 AM
The FAQ points it out.
| QUOTE (FAQ) |
| Natural Selection v3.0 final should ship with VALVe software's Anti-Cheat support (VAC). The team will also work with other cheat protection software authors on request. |
Searching for it is useless, because it is so small, it hides in the cracks between all the tiles where all the Forum Pages go to bathe.
Everytime I look for a Secure Game of NS, it does not exist.
A pose an important question to you my dear readers out there on the frontier reaches, seeking to play honest game, and still rack up the head count.
What has happened to our dear beloved VAC?
coris
Jun 29 2005, 01:56 PM
VAC isn't updated anymore anyway, but NS doesn't support it. Maybe NS:S Will?
tankefugl
Jun 29 2005, 02:00 PM
Actually, VAC2 is going through its beta phase, and will according to Valve support third party mods when the beta is over. So we'll just have to wait and see.
TOmekki
Jun 29 2005, 02:23 PM
| QUOTE (midspace @ Jun 29 2005, 06:51 AM) |
The FAQ points it out.
| QUOTE (FAQ) | | Natural Selection v3.0 final should ship with VALVe software's Anti-Cheat support (VAC). The team will also work with other cheat protection software authors on request. |
Searching for it is useless, because it is so small, it hides in the cracks between all the tiles where all the Forum Pages go to bathe.
Everytime I look for a Secure Game of NS, it does not exist.
A pose an important question to you my dear readers out there on the frontier reaches, seeking to play honest game, and still rack up the head count.
What has happened to our dear beloved VAC?
|
there really arent that much cheaters
tankefugl
Jun 29 2005, 02:30 PM
Anti-cheat also cuts down on the cheat accusations, whether there are cheats or not.
joee
Jun 29 2005, 03:22 PM
| QUOTE (TOmekki @ Jun 29 2005, 09:23 AM) |
| QUOTE (midspace @ Jun 29 2005, 06:51 AM) | The FAQ points it out.
| QUOTE (FAQ) | | Natural Selection v3.0 final should ship with VALVe software's Anti-Cheat support (VAC). The team will also work with other cheat protection software authors on request. |
Searching for it is useless, because it is so small, it hides in the cracks between all the tiles where all the Forum Pages go to bathe.
Everytime I look for a Secure Game of NS, it does not exist.
A pose an important question to you my dear readers out there on the frontier reaches, seeking to play honest game, and still rack up the head count.
What has happened to our dear beloved VAC?
|
there really arent that much cheaters
|
i kind of doubt that but we'll see i guess, it's not like anyone really will take time to make cheats for ns, since the only ones are really slightly modified ogc hooks
TOmekki
Jun 29 2005, 03:51 PM
| QUOTE (tankefugl @ Jun 29 2005, 09:30 AM) |
| Anti-cheat also cuts down on the cheat accusations, whether there are cheats or not. |
true, but then the blame carries to something else
~rates
~scripts
~modelhax
~msn messenger wallhack
joee
Jun 29 2005, 04:13 PM
nm
coris
Jun 29 2005, 04:54 PM
| QUOTE (tankefugl @ Jun 29 2005, 03:00 PM) |
| Actually, VAC2 is going through its beta phase, and will according to Valve support third party mods when the beta is over. So we'll just have to wait and see. |
Isn't that only for source?
DuoGodOfDeath
Jun 29 2005, 05:14 PM
VAC one was a horrible failure. I doubt VAC 2 will hardly make a difference in the anti-cheat community. It will probably only slow down the coders of cheats nothing more :/
puzl
Jun 29 2005, 06:25 PM
VAC2 will replace VAC on HL1 systems.
Jmmsbnd007
Jun 29 2005, 06:38 PM
| QUOTE (tankefugl @ Jun 29 2005, 09:30 AM) |
| Anti-cheat also cuts down on the cheat accusations, whether there are cheats or not. |
No, it won't. For every anti-cheat device out there, there's always either an anti-anti-cheat (cheating-death-death for example), or cheats that can evade and make it past the current anti-cheat.
Emanon
Jun 29 2005, 06:57 PM
| QUOTE (tankefugl @ Jun 29 2005, 09:30 AM) |
| Anti-cheat also cuts down on the cheat accusations, whether there are cheats or not. |
Not to sure about that, my fellow server ops and myself have been accused of cheating even with the icon next to our name.
joee
Jun 29 2005, 07:14 PM
unless the cs multihooks work for ns as well, i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS
maybe the basic wallhacks would work but the whole esp \ aimbot \ etc might not
DuoGodOfDeath
Jun 29 2005, 07:33 PM
| QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 07:14 PM) |
unless the cs multihooks work for ns as well, i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS
maybe the basic wallhacks would work but the whole esp \ aimbot \ etc might not |
Any CS hack would work for NS. I doubt a Aimbot for say CS/DOD/TFC would work in NS but I do know there are some for NS.
coris
Jun 29 2005, 09:27 PM
I thought any OGC-hook with vecs for the ns models / hitboxes would work?
digz
Jun 29 2005, 10:33 PM
Um, general discussion anyone?
Fatal_Error
Jun 29 2005, 11:22 PM
| QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 03:14 PM) |
| i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS |
Well, then, you'd be, VERY, VERY, surprised.
joee
Jun 29 2005, 11:35 PM
| QUOTE (Fatal Error @ Jun 29 2005, 06:22 PM) |
| QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 03:14 PM) | | i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS |
Well, then, you'd be, VERY, VERY, surprised.
|
aren't they just ogc hooks with a small editing thing done for ns
Kenichi
Jun 30 2005, 02:16 AM
Actually, there are OGC type prorams specifically designed for NS. They hold many different wallhack modes, esp modes, and many different vecs. They are very sophisticated. Just because you havn't seen it, don't assume they don't exist. They do.
The better cheaters don't get caught, because they don't blatently cheat. Remember that.
joee
Jun 30 2005, 02:58 AM
| QUOTE (Kenichi @ Jun 29 2005, 09:16 PM) |
Actually, there are OGC type prorams specifically designed for NS. They hold many different wallhack modes, esp modes, and many different vecs. They are very sophisticated. Just because you havn't seen it, don't assume they don't exist. They do.
The better cheaters don't get caught, because they don't blatently cheat. Remember that. |
the question is 1. how long ago were they made and 2. would vac2 catch them
a hack from like a year ago will still work in ns
devicenull
Jun 30 2005, 03:11 AM
Vac2? I give it a day before its broken. Valve won't be able to update fast enough.
Align
Jun 30 2005, 09:15 AM
That's not what anticheat does either. It forces the cheaters to get the latest versions, meaning lazy buggers wont be able to play on that server. The lazy cheaters tend to be the biggest buttfaces so it's all good.
airyK
Jun 30 2005, 10:35 AM
| QUOTE (devicenull @ Jun 29 2005, 10:11 PM) |
| Vac2? I give it a day before its broken. Valve won't be able to update fast enough. |
I heard its already been broken :/
Alcapwn
Jun 30 2005, 05:12 PM
| QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 02:14 PM) |
unless the cs multihooks work for ns as well, i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS
maybe the basic wallhacks would work but the whole esp \ aimbot \ etc might not |
Not untill NS ends up on the "My Games" List anyway...
joee
Jun 30 2005, 05:37 PM
| QUOTE (WaterBoy @ Jun 30 2005, 12:12 PM) |
| QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 02:14 PM) | unless the cs multihooks work for ns as well, i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS
maybe the basic wallhacks would work but the whole esp \ aimbot \ etc might not |
Not untill NS ends up on the "My Games" List anyway... |
that's the double edged sword of people actally playing your mod
Kali
Jun 30 2005, 05:40 PM
I hope NS Source will use VAC2.
Depot
Jul 1 2005, 12:54 AM
| QUOTE (Kali @ Jun 30 2005, 01:40 PM) |
| I hope NS Source will use VAC2. |
Agreed.
Kenichi
Jul 1 2005, 03:25 AM
| QUOTE |
| QUOTE (Kenichi @ Jun 29 2005, 09:16 PM) | Actually, there are OGC type prorams specifically designed for NS. They hold many different wallhack modes, esp modes, and many different vecs. They are very sophisticated. Just because you havn't seen it, don't assume they don't exist. They do.
The better cheaters don't get caught, because they don't blatently cheat. Remember that. |
the question is 1. how long ago were they made and 2. would vac2 catch them
a hack from like a year ago will still work in ns
|
Ones from even back in 1.0 were rather good. However, they were just simple CS ogc changed with NS vecs. The current ones are rather advanced, and are spankin new.
Do hacks from a year ago still work? dunno.
| QUOTE |
| I heard its already been broken :/ |
Considering its still a BETA I don't think this phrase is valid.
| QUOTE |
| I hope NS Source will use VAC2. |
If what valve says is true about it, there is no reason NS3.0 shouldnt work on it. We shall see.
UrbanConflict
Jul 2 2005, 07:51 AM
Unfortunately, there are more features for Natural Selection hacks Ive seen than most Counter-Stike ones. Health ESP, Structure ESP, Class ESP, just crazier stuff.
Ritchey
Jul 2 2005, 05:58 PM
| QUOTE (puzl @ Jun 29 2005, 01:25 PM) |
| VAC2 will replace VAC on HL1 systems. |
actually they'll both be running
UrbanConflict
Jul 2 2005, 11:16 PM
VAC1 can be disabled with a cetain amount of code and a single pointer address. Its ridicuouls, but cheats are always 500 times easier to develop if there is an SDK to develop mods, because all cheats are really just client-side modifications. Simply hook your functions in GetProcAddress and use ForceLib to inject.
LigerXT5
Jul 7 2005, 04:11 PM
well the best anti cheat out there is a REAL PERSON aka Admins on shifts or something to that.
as you may have sen in my thread on general server disscussion thread. i am hosting a 1 week/month, hasnt happend yet, but ill be there on my pc watching everything as much as i realy can.
ill even have a recording going on and it will stop every hour,save, and a new one starts so no "taking long hours tring to find clues" in one file.
thats the best i can think of.
if you use a program to keep an eye out for hacks and cheats, it has no common sense what so ever.
CrazySteve
Jul 7 2005, 07:05 PM
i totally agree, though vac isn't too much of a hassel because its pretty much built in (meaning that the person on the client side doesn't have to do anything)
i think i read somewhere that vac2 is supposed to have mod support, i could be talking out my **** though
XCan
Jul 7 2005, 07:09 PM
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD...
daidalos
Jul 7 2005, 07:32 PM
| QUOTE (XCan @ Jul 7 2005, 09:09 PM) |
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD... |
yeah, of course CD is better, for giving me an fps drop down to 30-40 frames sometimes >_>
Hopefully vac will be included :|
Alcapwn
Jul 7 2005, 07:55 PM
| QUOTE (XCan @ Jul 7 2005, 02:09 PM) |
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD... |
By much longer you mean the 10 seconds it takes to download and Activate, right?
CrazySteve
Jul 7 2005, 08:35 PM
if you hate vac then you must also hate any server with any type of downloads or custom maps, heck on tfc it takes maybe 3 seconds max to load vac for me
its like having secruity on your computer, yeah it won't catch everything BUT it helps and can catch stuff a person would not easily see.
XCan
Jul 7 2005, 08:50 PM
| QUOTE (CrazySteve @ Jul 7 2005, 10:35 PM) |
if you hate vac then you must also hate any server with any type of downloads or custom maps, heck on tfc it takes maybe 3 seconds max to load vac for me
its like having secruity on your computer, yeah it won't catch everything BUT it helps and can catch stuff a person would not easily see. |
Yes I do hate servers running custom maps and never play on them, and to some previous poster saying it takes 10 secs more than usual. Well maybe 10 secs isn't much if you just take it out of the contest, but with a normal loading time of under 10 secs I see no reason why I would have to wait more than double the normal loading time for an anti-cheat that doesn't do much good.
CrazySteve
Jul 8 2005, 03:21 AM
then if a server doesn't care about it they can just run it unsecured
it is better then the alternatives right now like CD
midspace
Jul 11 2005, 06:59 AM
| QUOTE (XCan @ Jul 8 2005, 06:09 AM) |
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD... |
Which games are you playing, that it takes so long for VAC to connect and verify?
Soylent_green
Jul 12 2005, 12:59 PM
| QUOTE (midspace @ Jul 11 2005, 01:59 AM) |
| QUOTE (XCan @ Jul 8 2005, 06:09 AM) | I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD... |
Which games are you playing, that it takes so long for VAC to connect and verify?
|
Seems to take 3x longer when playing dod for some reason.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.