Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Vac - Valve Anti Cheat
Unknown Worlds Forums > Natural Selection > Natural Selection Discussion > NS General Discussion
midspace
The FAQ points it out.

QUOTE (FAQ)
Natural Selection v3.0 final should ship with VALVe software's Anti-Cheat support (VAC). The team will also work with other cheat protection software authors on request.


Searching for it is useless, because it is so small, it hides in the cracks between all the tiles where all the Forum Pages go to bathe.

Everytime I look for a Secure Game of NS, it does not exist.

A pose an important question to you my dear readers out there on the frontier reaches, seeking to play honest game, and still rack up the head count.

What has happened to our dear beloved VAC?
coris
VAC isn't updated anymore anyway, but NS doesn't support it. Maybe NS:S Will?
tankefugl
Actually, VAC2 is going through its beta phase, and will according to Valve support third party mods when the beta is over. So we'll just have to wait and see.
TOmekki
QUOTE (midspace @ Jun 29 2005, 06:51 AM)
The FAQ points it out.

QUOTE (FAQ)
Natural Selection v3.0 final should ship with VALVe software's Anti-Cheat support (VAC). The team will also work with other cheat protection software authors on request.


Searching for it is useless, because it is so small, it hides in the cracks between all the tiles where all the Forum Pages go to bathe.

Everytime I look for a Secure Game of NS, it does not exist.

A pose an important question to you my dear readers out there on the frontier reaches, seeking to play honest game, and still rack up the head count.

What has happened to our dear beloved VAC?

there really arent that much cheaters
tankefugl
Anti-cheat also cuts down on the cheat accusations, whether there are cheats or not.
joee
QUOTE (TOmekki @ Jun 29 2005, 09:23 AM)
QUOTE (midspace @ Jun 29 2005, 06:51 AM)
The FAQ points it out.

QUOTE (FAQ)
Natural Selection v3.0 final should ship with VALVe software's Anti-Cheat support (VAC). The team will also work with other cheat protection software authors on request.


Searching for it is useless, because it is so small, it hides in the cracks between all the tiles where all the Forum Pages go to bathe.

Everytime I look for a Secure Game of NS, it does not exist.

A pose an important question to you my dear readers out there on the frontier reaches, seeking to play honest game, and still rack up the head count.

What has happened to our dear beloved VAC?

there really arent that much cheaters

i kind of doubt that but we'll see i guess, it's not like anyone really will take time to make cheats for ns, since the only ones are really slightly modified ogc hooks
TOmekki
QUOTE (tankefugl @ Jun 29 2005, 09:30 AM)
Anti-cheat also cuts down on the cheat accusations, whether there are cheats or not.

true, but then the blame carries to something else

~rates
~scripts
~modelhax
~msn messenger wallhack
joee
nm
coris
QUOTE (tankefugl @ Jun 29 2005, 03:00 PM)
Actually, VAC2 is going through its beta phase, and will according to Valve support third party mods when the beta is over. So we'll just have to wait and see.

Isn't that only for source?
DuoGodOfDeath
VAC one was a horrible failure. I doubt VAC 2 will hardly make a difference in the anti-cheat community. It will probably only slow down the coders of cheats nothing more :/
puzl
VAC2 will replace VAC on HL1 systems.

Jmmsbnd007
QUOTE (tankefugl @ Jun 29 2005, 09:30 AM)
Anti-cheat also cuts down on the cheat accusations, whether there are cheats or not.

No, it won't. For every anti-cheat device out there, there's always either an anti-anti-cheat (cheating-death-death for example), or cheats that can evade and make it past the current anti-cheat.
Emanon
QUOTE (tankefugl @ Jun 29 2005, 09:30 AM)
Anti-cheat also cuts down on the cheat accusations, whether there are cheats or not.

Not to sure about that, my fellow server ops and myself have been accused of cheating even with the icon next to our name.

joee
unless the cs multihooks work for ns as well, i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS

maybe the basic wallhacks would work but the whole esp \ aimbot \ etc might not
DuoGodOfDeath
QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 07:14 PM)
unless the cs multihooks work for ns as well, i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS

maybe the basic wallhacks would work but the whole esp \ aimbot \ etc might not

Any CS hack would work for NS. I doubt a Aimbot for say CS/DOD/TFC would work in NS but I do know there are some for NS.
coris
I thought any OGC-hook with vecs for the ns models / hitboxes would work?
digz
Um, general discussion anyone?
Fatal_Error
QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 03:14 PM)
i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS

Well, then, you'd be, VERY, VERY, surprised.
joee
QUOTE (Fatal Error @ Jun 29 2005, 06:22 PM)
QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 03:14 PM)
i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS

Well, then, you'd be, VERY, VERY, surprised.

aren't they just ogc hooks with a small editing thing done for ns
Kenichi
Actually, there are OGC type prorams specifically designed for NS. They hold many different wallhack modes, esp modes, and many different vecs. They are very sophisticated. Just because you havn't seen it, don't assume they don't exist. They do.

The better cheaters don't get caught, because they don't blatently cheat. Remember that.
joee
QUOTE (Kenichi @ Jun 29 2005, 09:16 PM)
Actually, there are OGC type prorams specifically designed for NS. They hold many different wallhack modes, esp modes, and many different vecs. They are very sophisticated. Just because you havn't seen it, don't assume they don't exist. They do.

The better cheaters don't get caught, because they don't blatently cheat. Remember that.

the question is 1. how long ago were they made and 2. would vac2 catch them

a hack from like a year ago will still work in ns
devicenull
Vac2? I give it a day before its broken. Valve won't be able to update fast enough.
Align
That's not what anticheat does either. It forces the cheaters to get the latest versions, meaning lazy buggers wont be able to play on that server. The lazy cheaters tend to be the biggest buttfaces so it's all good.
airyK
QUOTE (devicenull @ Jun 29 2005, 10:11 PM)
Vac2? I give it a day before its broken. Valve won't be able to update fast enough.

I heard its already been broken :/
Alcapwn
QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 02:14 PM)
unless the cs multihooks work for ns as well, i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS

maybe the basic wallhacks would work but the whole esp \ aimbot \ etc might not

Not untill NS ends up on the "My Games" List anyway... wink-fix.gif
joee
QUOTE (WaterBoy @ Jun 30 2005, 12:12 PM)
QUOTE (joee @ Jun 29 2005, 02:14 PM)
unless the cs multihooks work for ns as well, i dont think people would honestly bother recoding a hook entirely for NS

maybe the basic wallhacks would work but the whole esp \ aimbot \ etc might not

Not untill NS ends up on the "My Games" List anyway... wink-fix.gif

that's the double edged sword of people actally playing your mod
Kali
I hope NS Source will use VAC2.
Depot
QUOTE (Kali @ Jun 30 2005, 01:40 PM)
I hope NS Source will use VAC2.

Agreed.
Kenichi
QUOTE
QUOTE (Kenichi @ Jun 29 2005, 09:16 PM)
Actually, there are OGC type prorams specifically designed for NS. They hold many different wallhack modes, esp modes, and many different vecs. They are very sophisticated. Just because you havn't seen it, don't assume they don't exist. They do.

The better cheaters don't get caught, because they don't blatently cheat. Remember that.

the question is 1. how long ago were they made and 2. would vac2 catch them

a hack from like a year ago will still work in ns


Ones from even back in 1.0 were rather good. However, they were just simple CS ogc changed with NS vecs. The current ones are rather advanced, and are spankin new.

Do hacks from a year ago still work? dunno.

QUOTE
I heard its already been broken :/


Considering its still a BETA I don't think this phrase is valid.

QUOTE
  I hope NS Source will use VAC2.


If what valve says is true about it, there is no reason NS3.0 shouldnt work on it. We shall see.
UrbanConflict
Unfortunately, there are more features for Natural Selection hacks Ive seen than most Counter-Stike ones. Health ESP, Structure ESP, Class ESP, just crazier stuff.
Ritchey
QUOTE (puzl @ Jun 29 2005, 01:25 PM)
VAC2 will replace VAC on HL1 systems.

actually they'll both be running
UrbanConflict
VAC1 can be disabled with a cetain amount of code and a single pointer address. Its ridicuouls, but cheats are always 500 times easier to develop if there is an SDK to develop mods, because all cheats are really just client-side modifications. Simply hook your functions in GetProcAddress and use ForceLib to inject.
LigerXT5
well the best anti cheat out there is a REAL PERSON aka Admins on shifts or something to that.

as you may have sen in my thread on general server disscussion thread. i am hosting a 1 week/month, hasnt happend yet, but ill be there on my pc watching everything as much as i realy can.

ill even have a recording going on and it will stop every hour,save, and a new one starts so no "taking long hours tring to find clues" in one file.

thats the best i can think of.

if you use a program to keep an eye out for hacks and cheats, it has no common sense what so ever.
CrazySteve
i totally agree, though vac isn't too much of a hassel because its pretty much built in (meaning that the person on the client side doesn't have to do anything)

i think i read somewhere that vac2 is supposed to have mod support, i could be talking out my **** though
XCan
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD... mad-fix.gif
daidalos
QUOTE (XCan @ Jul 7 2005, 09:09 PM)
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD... mad-fix.gif

yeah, of course CD is better, for giving me an fps drop down to 30-40 frames sometimes >_>

Hopefully vac will be included :|
Alcapwn
QUOTE (XCan @ Jul 7 2005, 02:09 PM)
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD... mad-fix.gif

By much longer you mean the 10 seconds it takes to download and Activate, right? confused-fix.gif
CrazySteve
if you hate vac then you must also hate any server with any type of downloads or custom maps, heck on tfc it takes maybe 3 seconds max to load vac for me

its like having secruity on your computer, yeah it won't catch everything BUT it helps and can catch stuff a person would not easily see.
XCan
QUOTE (CrazySteve @ Jul 7 2005, 10:35 PM)
if you hate vac then you must also hate any server with any type of downloads or custom maps, heck on tfc it takes maybe 3 seconds max to load vac for me

its like having secruity on your computer, yeah it won't catch everything BUT it helps and can catch stuff a person would not easily see.

Yes I do hate servers running custom maps and never play on them, and to some previous poster saying it takes 10 secs more than usual. Well maybe 10 secs isn't much if you just take it out of the contest, but with a normal loading time of under 10 secs I see no reason why I would have to wait more than double the normal loading time for an anti-cheat that doesn't do much good.
CrazySteve
then if a server doesn't care about it they can just run it unsecured

it is better then the alternatives right now like CD
midspace
QUOTE (XCan @ Jul 8 2005, 06:09 AM)
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD... mad-fix.gif

Which games are you playing, that it takes so long for VAC to connect and verify?
Soylent_green
QUOTE (midspace @ Jul 11 2005, 01:59 AM)
QUOTE (XCan @ Jul 8 2005, 06:09 AM)
I can't stand VAC, it takes much longer to connect while that crap needs to download itself and scan everytime you join a server, not to mention that it's not more effective than CD...  mad-fix.gif

Which games are you playing, that it takes so long for VAC to connect and verify?

Seems to take 3x longer when playing dod for some reason.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.