Silverwing
Jan 8 2005, 01:01 AM
I was wondering....
When I got the SDK for Source... well, first I yelled OMGOMGOMGTEHPWN, but then I went straight into creating an NS map. I just wanted to see if I could recreate the "feel" of NS.
I made a CS:S map and converted a few ns.wad textures but so far I haven't been able to get it right. I could do this with regular hammer tho...
Anyways, I was wondering if anyone else has tried? If so, would you mind showing off your results?
If nothing else, it might occupy us a bit while we wait for the (inevitable) announcement: NS:S.
/Silverwing:S
Hyperion
Jan 8 2005, 01:32 AM
Yes, I have, I converted all of ayumi.wad, and made normal maps,
the unfortunate news about this is that I have discovered (dev team take note)
that becuase NS textures are so superbly made for the HL engine, they will need to be remade for source so that normal maps work and so that the resolution is 512x512
i have SSs of 2 maps that I will post later for the benefit of those who are curious
KungFuDiscoMonkey
Jan 8 2005, 01:38 AM
I've mostly ported Altair just for kicks and like Hyperion was saying, the NS textures were optimized for the HL engine. You run into a few problems when you move to Source. For instance, the average wall texture in NS is 128x128, in Source it's 512x512. Most HL details are brush based, in source they're prop based and we don't really have any props to work with. The brushwork ports fairly seamlessly, but the textures will need to be updated and the entity work will be a bit messed up. We'll also need to get some new sexy props to decorate our maps.
Swiftspear
Jan 8 2005, 01:54 AM
Oooohh! NS:S on the way!
Hibame
Jan 8 2005, 02:01 AM
Iv been working on the techinal side of HL2 maps, got planes cars and various other neat things, like vgui_screen(latest work of head hurting) and most of logics. I made some nice looking maps after hl2 first came out but I soon found without the ablity to model/skin/animate very well my maps are limited to whats given =/
Hyperion
Jan 8 2005, 04:28 AM
OK, heres is one SS (from beta yes I know but its all ive got for this map)
You can see the problems created because of the low rez normal maps, and my lack of being able to get the alpha on the normal maps to work correctly.
EDIT: Crappy quality I know I was rushed, Ill do better later.
Swiftspear
Jan 8 2005, 04:45 AM
It still looks damn sexy as far as anything I have ever seen in NS is concerned.
Belgarion
Jan 8 2005, 08:19 AM
uhh... even as far as NS is concerned, i wouldn't take that over almost anything. it just doesn't look good. not to say NS won't look great on source, but the textures are like glass right now, and missing color. i'll wait till it's "later" till i say anything more.
Lt_Gravity
Jan 8 2005, 10:34 AM
another thing is the bad behaviour of the new vhe. I started retexturing an small map I did a few years ago. and thats the point: texturing doesnt work as "smooth" as one is usd to. another problem are the system requirements. loading all the textures and models took ages even with my 1.5ghz so I guess it would be a good ideas to "upgrade" first.
Im pretty annoyed about te fact that you cant simply use textureset a) within maps of mod b). tha cant be it! I never ever could get the idea behind adding the sdk to steam. after the last steam update vhe wasnt able to find the game.txt. good job valve!!! we love you all!!!!!!!
Hyperion
Jan 8 2005, 11:40 PM
That uber shinyness is the result of the fact that i could not figure out how to add the specualr factor "part" of the material, and as a result, its really shiny, itll look better when its done correctly (which I havent figured out yet).
TheGuy
Jan 9 2005, 03:03 AM
Flayra
Jan 9 2005, 03:34 AM
I'd be curious to see how the existing NS textures look in Source. I'm not sure it's going to make sense for us to redo all 30+ megs of textures, that's just an incredible amount of work. I'm sure the results would be incredible, but I don't think Cory would want to redo everything just for a graphical upgrade (and I don't blame him).
If anyone ports their NS map over to Source (especially an official NS map), I'd love to see screenshots of it. I tried importing the .wads and had a fair number of difficulties. I think Mendasp has had some good results so far, but I'm not sure.
Grizzly
Jan 9 2005, 10:05 AM
we seriusly need atleast some of the ns textures remade, or just sized up to go well in source
if annyone plan on doing that, tro to get the ns.wad "sourced" first
Sounds like a challenge, im going to try and pull a few NS textures over and see if i can run them in a map w/out probs. You say they need to be @ 512x512? And I saw somethin about a tga file?
Mendasp
Jan 9 2005, 02:24 PM
When I ported bast and sava, the textures were blurry (and the lighting was horribly dark), so I think we have no other alternative, the textures need to be remade, we can only hope that the massive hype of a NS port will get us good texture artists, heh.
As always, when I don't like something, I end up deleting it, so this would be the third time I've deleted the ported bast/sava, heh.
I still got a pic of Water Treatment with Alyx, you'll need to burn your monitor brightness to see anything, but you get the idea.

I used xwad to port all the textures in this port, the first ports were done "by hand" with vtex, lots of wally and image resizing programs.
ps.- If we port NS the first thing I'll remake is feedwater, god, that hive will look gorgeous!
Insane
Jan 9 2005, 02:25 PM
| QUOTE (Flayra @ Jan 9 2005, 03:34 AM) |
| I'd be curious to see how the existing NS textures look in Source. I'm not sure it's going to make sense for us to redo all 30+ megs of textures, that's just an incredible amount of work. I'm sure the results would be incredible, but I don't think Cory would want to redo everything just for a graphical upgrade (and I don't blame him). |
Thing is, as others have said, the current textures are really too small, being 128*128 or 256*256 for the most part whilst most Source textures are 512*512 and terrain textures are a whopping 1024*1024. If Cory still has the high res sources (assuming he made his textures at a higher res and then resized them), then it would be a simple case of resizing those to Source standards, and as they are already of a high graphical quality, I'm sure they would be fine. I'd be willing to bet that there are plenty of people from the community willing to do normal maps and such.
That said, the existing textures may work well enough in Source without the upgrade, but it would be nice to see them take advantage of the new engine.
Mendasp
Jan 9 2005, 02:27 PM
| QUOTE (Insane @ Jan 9 2005, 03:25 PM) |
| (assuming he made his textures at a higher res and then resized them) |
Remember when the detail textures were discovered? Well, someone emailed Cory for that, and it seems like they were done at final resolution/quality.
Insane
Jan 9 2005, 02:43 PM
Damn.
Supernorn
Jan 9 2005, 03:34 PM
We could always start a community project up to redo all the NS textures by hand...
TychoCelchuuu
Jan 9 2005, 04:56 PM
| QUOTE (Supernorn @ Jan 9 2005, 07:34 AM) |
| We could always start a community project up to redo all the NS textures by hand... |
I'll do the "Missing Texture" texture.
Meat_Popsicle
Jan 9 2005, 05:09 PM
i dont see the point in going to source just for prettier graphics, think of all the plyers ud lose who dont hav hl2 or that it wont run on their machine. itll only be worth doing if u can think of some amazing new feature which cant be done in the original half-life.
i say stay on this engine, include my training map, finish the mod, then move on to a new project
coris
Jan 9 2005, 07:16 PM
@Meat_pop I actually think that NS would run better on the sourceengine since the HL1 engine is beeing pushed to its very maxiumum already. Most machines can run HL2 decent.
PogoP
Jan 9 2005, 07:26 PM
Yeah I had a little go, but yeah like Mendasp said, we need new textures
6john
Jan 9 2005, 08:00 PM
would the textures have to be remade from scratch, or could the be resized and smoothed over or something
Thaldarin
Jan 9 2005, 08:12 PM
Brightened up Mendasps picture although Alyx and the VGUI looks horrendous, rest of it is a bit clearer now.
Also, they don't look too blurry if I'm honest. Although then again this is just one screenshot, and you've played it in-game so you must know best

EDIT: By they don't look too blurry, I mean they are just about playable without losing your mind or thinking "these textures are rubbish".
Hibame
Jan 9 2005, 08:20 PM
Any one know how to make a vgui_screen button trigger a door, I cant get it to work =(
Hyperion
Jan 9 2005, 08:38 PM
The problem that I have with the current NS textures is that they already have specualr highlights and faked shadows, which is why I think that they need to be redone (aside from higher rez). Also, I think that the community project for porting them is a good one.
Ah yes, another problem is that there are MANY NS textures that are not Powers of 2 which is really annoying because you cant directly port them over......
eAi
Jan 10 2005, 12:18 AM
Also, adding bump mapping (etc) would really liven up some of the textures - feedwater glistening with reflections for example. As the previous post said, some of the textures contain things that could be rendered on-the-fly.
eAi
ssjyoda
Jan 10 2005, 03:15 AM
the community has done some good side projects before.. im sure doin somethin like this is possible.. it'll be tricky though, redoin the textures nd makin sure they dont screw up current maps.
Belgarion
Jan 10 2005, 08:43 AM
how would they screw up current maps? seeing as a HL map won't load in HL2 and all..
Meat_Popsicle
Jan 10 2005, 09:30 AM
surely if its the same texture stretched over the same sized surface, itll be just as blurry as before?
mrcoffee
Jan 10 2005, 11:48 AM
I'm trying to port the map I'm working on straight over to source but I'm having a problem with xwad. Everytime I try and convert any wad using the command line below xwad does nothing and tells me that I'm "missing a parameter". Can anyone see whats missing from below?
"C:\Program files\Valve\Steam\SteamApps\chrisrocketz@hotmail.com\sourcesdk\bin\xwad.exe" -BaseDir "c:\Steam\SteamApps\chrisrocketz@hotmail.com\half-life\ns\" -WadFile "c:\valve\steam\steamapps\Half-Life\ns\ns.wad"
Hyperion
Jan 10 2005, 05:00 PM
Sure, mappers would have to resize their textures, but its really easy to do with the "replace" button, and all you have to do is cut your scaling in half.
And MP, yes, they would be just as ugly, thats why we need to make them higher rez and scale them down by half in hammer.
Mendasp
Jan 10 2005, 08:12 PM
| QUOTE (Hyperion @ Jan 10 2005, 06:00 PM) |
| Sure, mappers would have to resize their textures, but its really easy to do with the "replace" button, and all you have to do is cut your scaling in half. |
I don't think that would do the maps justice, if you port to Source, do it with style. Start from (almost) scratch!
Kinda like Counter-Strike: Source, except NS doesn't it need it so much in comparison, as some maps are very detailed already.
PogoP
Jan 10 2005, 08:15 PM
Yeah just think of what is possible with 3d skyboxes in NS:S, that would be so cool.
tomteverkstan
Jan 10 2005, 08:36 PM
would be even cooler if they where dynamic... seen somewhere that they cant be changed
would be cool though seeing scraps or a driftig ship floating around =)
Mendasp
Jan 10 2005, 08:51 PM
| QUOTE (tomteverkstan @ Jan 10 2005, 09:36 PM) |
would be even cooler if they where dynamic... seen somewhere that they cant be changed would be cool though seeing scraps or a driftig ship floating around =) |
Dynamic what? The skyboxes? It's perfectly possible. You can put moving stuff in there, you can even have players there.
ssjyoda
Jan 10 2005, 09:08 PM
so.. someone start work on a next texture set or something... it seems to be the only thing holdin back maps bein done right now... i can't do textures for the life of me, i woulda tryed already, heh. infact i did, but im horrible. haha. whoeva thinks they can contribute speak up
Grizzly
Jan 10 2005, 09:56 PM
and do it now!
for the TSA (and kharaa)!
and the holy cookie of great justice!
Hyperion
Jan 11 2005, 12:16 AM
atm im trying to get the F-ING xsi mod tool to make normal maps from models for me so I can start doing the good old flr_ textures ya know the one with the 3 rectangles? ya that one, and let me tell you, if anyone has d3_normalmap_gen, let me know!
tomteverkstan
Jan 12 2005, 08:01 PM
| QUOTE (Mendasp @ Jan 10 2005, 03:51 PM) |
Dynamic what? The skyboxes? It's perfectly possible. You can put moving stuff in there, you can even have players there. |
ohh, ive never tried but just heard... grr, cant trust people no more
must try it out as soon as possible
Cagey
Jan 12 2005, 08:37 PM
| QUOTE (tomteverkstan @ Jan 12 2005, 12:01 PM) |
| QUOTE (Mendasp @ Jan 10 2005, 03:51 PM) | Dynamic what? The skyboxes? It's perfectly possible. You can put moving stuff in there, you can even have players there. |
ohh, ive never tried but just heard... grr, cant trust people no more must try it out as soon as possible |
I think the confusion here is that dynamic elements inside skyboxes are possible, but swapping from one skybox to another without a level transition apparently isn't.
Some_tall_guy1
Jan 12 2005, 09:02 PM
Well if they're dynamic im sure you could simulate that somehow cagey.
BigD
Jan 12 2005, 09:12 PM
Ooooh... imagine having a space station that's rotating around a planet (though the planet actually does moving of course) would it be possible to have the light change dynamically? For example, if the port side of the ship was facing a star or planet, the rooms could be lit up more and then then when it rotates 180 degrees, the starboard side rooms could be lit up more again! That would be a hella cool effect!
Spacer
Jan 12 2005, 09:36 PM
I doubt anyone in the NS forums atm can do textures that'd match cory's in quality >_>.
Supernorn
Jan 12 2005, 10:36 PM
| QUOTE (Spacer @ Jan 12 2005, 10:36 PM) |
| I doubt anyone in the NS forums atm can do textures that'd match cory's in quality >_>. |
Original version of Wall_lab:

512X512 version of Wall_lab (created from scratch)

Update:
14/1/05
- Slight visual tweaks made
- Merged the old version in with the new one slightly.
-Removed circle thingy. Didnt really like it, or know what it was. Neither did anyone else.
Spacer
Jan 12 2005, 10:42 PM
| QUOTE (Spacer @ Jan 12 2005, 04:36 PM) |
| I doubt anyone in the NS forums atm can do textures that'd match cory's in quality >_>. |
Quoted for emphasis

.
DrunkenBozo
Jan 12 2005, 10:43 PM
How does it look tiled?
Malevolent
Jan 12 2005, 10:48 PM
Looks quite nice there Norn.
KungFuDiscoMonkey
Jan 12 2005, 10:49 PM
Excellent work Supernorn, now to get started on the other 1000 textures
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.